Skip to content

Conversation

estringana
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Reviewer checklist

  • Test coverage seems ok.
  • Appropriate labels assigned.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.13%. Comparing base (1fa51af) to head (0161972).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3381   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.13%   62.13%           
=======================================
  Files         141      141           
  Lines       12622    12622           
  Branches     1650     1650           
=======================================
  Hits         7843     7843           
  Misses       4053     4053           
  Partials      726      726           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1fa51af...0161972. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Benchmarks [ tracer ]

Benchmark execution time: 2025-10-21 16:48:47

Comparing candidate commit 0161972 in PR branch estringana/collect-framework-endpoints with baseline commit 1fa51af in branch master.

Found 9 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 180 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:ComposerTelemetryBench/benchTelemetryParsing

  • 🟩 execution_time [-1.557µs; -0.643µs] or [-13.425%; -5.540%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-5.582µs; -4.258µs] or [-5.276%; -4.024%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverhead

  • 🟩 execution_time [-61.743µs; -58.070µs] or [-23.199%; -21.819%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverhead-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-60.274µs; -55.520µs] or [-22.854%; -21.051%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverheadWithDBM

  • 🟩 execution_time [-61.164µs; -58.446µs] or [-23.065%; -22.041%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverheadWithDBM-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-60.357µs; -57.548µs] or [-23.024%; -21.952%]

scenario:PHPRedisBench/benchRedisOverhead

  • 🟩 execution_time [-309.436µs; -287.484µs] or [-28.750%; -26.710%]

scenario:PHPRedisBench/benchRedisOverhead-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-318.796µs; -286.975µs] or [-28.749%; -25.879%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+31.888ns; +108.512ns] or [+2.642%; +8.989%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching2

  • 🟥 execution_time [+63.307ns; +139.293ns] or [+5.361%; +11.795%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching3

  • 🟥 execution_time [+44.558ns; +120.642ns] or [+3.726%; +10.090%]

scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching4

  • 🟥 execution_time [+81.600ns; +130.400ns] or [+6.923%; +11.064%]

scenario:SpanBench/benchOpenTelemetryAPI

  • 🟥 mem_peak [+1.317MB; +1.341MB] or [+3.160%; +3.217%]

scenario:TraceSerializationBench/benchSerializeTrace

  • 🟩 execution_time [-36.017µs; -23.283µs] or [-8.152%; -5.270%]

@estringana estringana force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch from 96601ba to 791f8e7 Compare August 27, 2025 10:38
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
--TEST--
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ignore this file




typedef enum ddog_crasht_CrashInfoBuilder_NewResult_Tag {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file got autogenerated

"backtrace",
"blazesym",
"cc",
"cc_utils",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This got removed automatically. Not sure why

}
);

if (!\DDTrace\are_endpoints_collected()) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will be adapted. Just an idea of how it will be used

@estringana estringana force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch from f5413d6 to e1212be Compare October 6, 2025 08:39
@cataphract cataphract force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch from 1a9903d to e1212be Compare October 10, 2025 09:55
@estringana estringana force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch 2 times, most recently from e5a8967 to 4deea57 Compare October 20, 2025 10:43
@estringana estringana force-pushed the estringana/collect-framework-endpoints branch from e2c597b to b66e5b7 Compare October 21, 2025 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants